• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Novus Leadership Institute

Helping you succeed despite relentless change

  • NLI Home
  • Free session
  • About the Institute
  • AI tsunami and you
  • Partner
  • Insights
  • Insights list
  • Contact Us

Mike Russell

“Wrong Until Right” Does NOT Mean “Guilty Until Proven Innocent” – Part 2

February 28, 2016 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

Micromanagement reduces empowerment, motivation, and success - Mike Russell

In the last insight, we started looking at situations in which something went wrong that involved others in your business, as opposed to primarily you as a leader.

Two responses are common.  The first is to seek someone to blame.  The second is to usurp control and try to personally correct the situation.  Unfortunately, those two responses lead to lower performance and poorer results over time, especially in an environment of relentless change.

The previous insight looked at the first response.  In this edition, we’ll look at the second. [Read more…] about “Wrong Until Right” Does NOT Mean “Guilty Until Proven Innocent” – Part 2

Filed Under: Uncategorized

“Wrong Until Right” Does NOT Mean “Guilty Until Proven Innocent”

February 23, 2016 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

"Wrong Until Right" or "Guilty Until Innocent" - Mike Russell

Think about the last few instances when something went wrong that directly involved others on your team or in your business, not you as a leader …

What did you do?  Did you try to find out who was responsible?  Did you assume control and try to correct the situation?  Something else?

The first two responses are not uncommon.  Unfortunately, those two responses can lead to lower performance and poorer results over time, especially in an environment of relentless change.  Let’s look at why. [Read more…] about “Wrong Until Right” Does NOT Mean “Guilty Until Proven Innocent”

Filed Under: Uncategorized

One month into the year …

January 31, 2016 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

If your answer is “yes” … congratulations!  You have managed to do better than most businesses, as most businesses face uncertainties during the year that will already have caused turbulence for the original plan.  And a warning:  are you sure there are no changes needed to the plan?  If your business is in a changing market or environment, then following the original plan on cruise control can be a dangerous thing.  Make sure you are really looking for potential change both now and down the road.

If your answer is “no” … congratulations if you are dealing with reality of change around you and making changes to your plans as you go.  Remember that planning under uncertainty results in plans that are more assumption-based than fact.  Execution of the plans and quickly testing assumptions will help you correct the trajectory and stay on a profitable path.

If your answer is “no” but not because of external factors or plan assumptions, then what is causing the change?  Are business operations chaotic or unpredictable?  Then do the work to establish consistency.  Without a sufficiently consistent baseline, making improvements or executing plans will be practically useless as there is no way to tell if any of the improvements or plans made any difference or if results are merely due to inconsistency.

If your answer is “I don’t know” … then quickly find out.  For most businesses, markets and other factors can change faster than the old annual or semiannual or even quarterly review of the annual plan.  Set up processes to get the data you need to see how the currents and winds are moving around your business ship and adjust accordingly and more frequently.

Think about this now as time flies!

 

By Mike Russell

Filed Under: Uncategorized

16 Things for ’16

December 31, 2015 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

Don’t like agility, feedback, and change?

Here are some pointers for maintaining or increasing your organization’s rigidity in the coming year, updated for 2016:

  1. Don’t learn anything from last year.
  2. If you think you did learn something, don’t apply it or tell anyone else.
  3. Certainly don’t change any plans you have already made, even if conditions have changed since the plans were made.  And do not make any changes during the year, either.  That would give the impression of fallibility on your part.
  4. Make 2016 plans are completely detailed for the entire company … who will do what and when throughout the year.  There should be no independent actions at any time.
  5. Do not include employee development in the 2016 plan.  Development implies change, and we do not want change.
  6. Base all performance plans on the detailed annual plan, with no provision for changes if anything unanticipated occurs.
  7. Include only individual goals and work plans in performance plans, not team or joint goals.
  8. Have everyone focus only on results for their area, not the overall value provided to customers or total financial results.
  9. Check your HR systems and policies to ensure each employee competes against other employees for raises, bonuses, etc.
  10. Make sure all employees are 100% utilized during the year.  Better to focus on activity and be doing busywork to keep them out of trouble.  Do not focus on results … doing so could lead to change.
  11. Demand innovation but don’t reward innovation or anyone taking risks.  Punish anyone who does something that was not in the 2016 plan or efforts that are not perfect the first time.
  12. Also ask employees to make improvements, but do not allow any “normal” time for making the improvements … and make sure everyone knows that “normal” work comes first.
  13. Hire for the past, not the future, and especially look for “yes people” and those without initiative.
  14. Use narrow, very detailed job descriptions and only allow people to work on what is in their particular job description.
  15. Allow the possibility of change but make the change process so complex and difficult that nothing of consequence will actually be approved.
  16. Leaders should be models of desired behavior.  Therefore, make sure you model command and control, rigidity, and close-mindedness at every opportunity.

By Mike Russell

Filed Under: Uncategorized

4X

November 30, 2015 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

“Training” in most companies is viewed as a one-time learning event.

However, we advocate some form of follow-on activities for improved retention and, most importantly, actual effective application of the training.

Why?  Research and practical experience has shown that follow-on assistance in applying learning after the training event provides dramatically better ROI.  Like 4 TIMES (the “4X” in the title) better returns if coaching is provided after the training.

Is most of your company’s internal training single-event focused?  If so, consider how follow-on activities might dramatically improve your ROI …

Otherwise, your training may be largely ineffective and, as colleague Leigh Quinn puts it, delivering merely “entertrainment.”

 

By Mike Russell

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Wrong Until Right

September 26, 2015 by Mike Russell Leave a Comment

From the opening of the book Wrong Until Right – How to Succeed Despite Relentless Change:

 

Relentless.

Accelerating.

Disruptive.

Turbulent.

Unprecedented.

All these descriptions – and more like them – have been used to describe change in today’s world.  And no more so than in the business world.

That level and type of change brings with it uncertainty and risk, reducing our ability to confidently and preemptively determine what we must do to succeed.

In the past, business leaders have been accustomed to being able to predict what actions were needed – to be “right” in their decisions and how they lead.  Unfortunately, this mindset is becoming increasingly ineffective in today’s world.

To succeed, leaders must now change their approach from “right until wrong” to “wrong until right.”

“Wrong” in this context does not mean poor judgment or action.  “Wrong” means that despite trying well, we still may encounter errors due to high rates of change and not enough knowledge to determine what will be “right” at the time our product or service reaches the marketplace.  Rather than sticking to some pre-determined path, we make incremental corrections and use interim “wrongs” to eventually get to “right.”

“Right until wrong” … “wrong until right” … sound like subtle word play but represent the difference needed to win in today’s business world.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Leadership Inspiration, Insight, and Implementation

Get the latest insights. Read the blog.

Copyright © 2025 · Novus Leadership Institute, LLC and Mike Russell